In BFGoodrich KO2, the shoulders design greatly improves sidewall durability. On this terrain, the BF Goodrich KO2 may dominate the Toyo Open Country AT3. However, we suppose that Toyo Open Country AT3 can do the same more easily. In general, BFGoodrich KO2 performs pretty well in mud. In reverse, with thinner grooves and smaller studs, KO2 can’t push the mud backward as effectively as AT3. In this case, both have distinct shoulder designs that permit them to boost their biting capabilities.įurthermore, the bigger lugs along the shoulders of the AT3 also aid in the clearance of mud from the grooves. Therefore, the design of the shoulders is crucial. Mud performance is often correlated with the capacity to evacuate and bite. BFGoodrich All Terrain KO2Īs a result, although both of them work well in wet terrain, the design of AT3 makes it slightly beyond KO2, especially at higher speeds. However, you do not need to worry because the KO2 is also equipped with voids and grooves with a reasonable ratio to help drain water in wet terrain. While working excellent in dry, BFGoodrich KO2 does not perform as well as AT3 on slippery roads. Toyo’s design’s large, wide grooves allow for smoother drainage, increase wet traction, and avoid hydroplaning. On the contrary, the Toyo Open Country AT3 outperforms its competition in wet conditions, thanks to its design on sipes density. Thanks to its slightly better grip, the KO2 can deliver better directional stability and striding feedback when at high speed. We suppose the difference lies in steering and handling ability may be slightly different when we accelerate. However, in reality, both of these all-terrain tires work well in dry conditions simply because all-terrain tires have good traction. As a result, those elements make the grip of KO2 could be slightly better. In addition, the large grooves and tread blocks of this tire are also smaller than KO2 in general. On-road Performance Dry ConditionsĪs mentioned before, the higher density of voids makes AT3 have less contact with the road than KO2. The prominent feature here is that the sidewalls of KO2 are enhanced by 20% toughness through the CoreGard Technology, which can prevent the phenomenon of bruising or splitting sidewalls. Additionally, the 3D sipes are also equipped to maximize stability and traction. So, it provides a wider contact area between the tire and the road, which enhances traction in general. On the other hand, BFGoodrich KO2 is designed with a lower voids ratio and bigger tread blocks in a C shape. Toyo Open Country AT3įurthermore, in rough terrain, the big lateral grooves are supplied with stone-ejecting blocks to remove stuck stones, if any. From there, AT3 may bring drivers enhanced stability and resistance ability. In the center, the S-shaped section offers an eye-catching appearance for this tire.Īll of the above tread features aim to improve off-road traction and tread block stiffness. Compared to its rival, its voids are larger and higher. This tire has a symmetrical design with a high ratio of scattered voids. The innovative feature comes from the chip-and-cut resistant material compounds that make up the Toyo Open Country AT3. Besides, it is also entitled to 50,000 miles of limited warranty. In other words, the users can make an exchange as announced policy if they’re not satisfied with KO2. This tire also gains the 3PMSF certification for good snow performance.īFGoodrich manufacturer also offers a satisfaction guarantee service for this tire within 60 days, which is a plus. It has flexible traction for both on-road and off-road adventures. The manufacturer claims that this is the toughest BFGoodrich’s one in all-terrain tires. However, KO2 is available in about 86 sizes for wheel diameters from 15 to 22 inches. Similar to its competition, the BFGoodrich KO2 is built to serve light trucks, SUVs, and CUVs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |